Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
842-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

842-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.047912 50.858716)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.047856 50.858710,-1.047858 50.858721,-1.047866 50.858731,-1.047879 50.858739,-1.047894 50.858745,-1.047912 50.858747,-1.047929 50.858745,-1.047945 50.858740,-1.047958 50.858732,-1.047966 50.858722,-1.047969 50.858711,-1.047967 50.858700,-1.047959 50.858690,-1.047946 50.858682,-1.047931 50.858677,-1.047913 50.858675,-1.047896 50.858676,-1.047880 50.858681,-1.047867 50.858689,-1.047859 50.858699,-1.047856 50.858710)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL